Rampant religious extremism and sectarianism are wracking Pakistan today. The religiously frenzied features of Pakistani culture, politics and society are remnants of the long and dark shadow of General Ziaul Haq’s 11 years of Islamist rule that structured the entire state as a theatre of religion. Zia’s regime was a setback for a faltering democratic process and ushered in an era of religious obscurantism that affected every facet of domestic and foreign policy. He saw Islam as a part of revolutionary process to overhaul Pakistan. But in the last four decades, there has been a complete erosion of the moral values of our society.
History bears testimony to the fact that the military complex and political leadership are the factors responsible for promoting and strengthening the hegemony and influence of religious extremist bigots. The former supports so-called mullahs for a jihadist cause, strengthening the military narrative at the national level and to counter the political and nationalist narratives in the state and the latter have always exploited the religious card to legitimize authority, secure votes and counter opposition. The current imperium of Tehrik Labbaik Pakistan bigots and the tolerant behaviour of the government towards extremist clerics are the consequences of the state’s mullah-centric policies.
Extremism is the biggest enemy of the nation, which is not only weakening the already deteriorating governance system in the country but also undermining national dignity and Pakistan’s global image. Given the current religious insecurity, Pakistan has to redesign its narrative and soften its policies towards the religious bigots and extremists in order to stabilize the state. It is incumbent upon the state to ensure the supremacy of the Constitution and rule of law, which is an effective way to establish the writ of the state.
The current unrest erupted across major cities in Pakistan on Monday after TLP Chief Saad Hussain Rizvi was detained by security forces in Lahore as a “pre-emptive measure” ahead of the party’s April 20 deadline to the government, as the PTI government had promised the TLP last November that they would take up the matter of the French ambassador’s expulsion from Pakistan with Parliament in protest against the publication of blasphemous images in that country. The siege of various cities of the country by mobilized religious bigots has once again challenged the writ of the state. The entire state seems powerless against extremist mobs who have openly challenged the state’s writ. This manifestly represents the strength and influence of religious fundamentalists in Pakistan. The way the administration has collapsed in the face of mob violence is alarming and brings into question the responsibility of the forces in question. It also underscores the state’s ability to deal with rising religious extremism.
Religious organizations in Pakistan have a significant influence over particular segments of society, which they can mobilize for their objectives. They draw their strength from their connection to a sizable segment of the society through which they exert pressure on the state to adopt extremist policies. The role of religious organizations in making Pakistan an Islamic state is well known; their subsequent success in pressurizing Z.A. Bhutto to declare Ahmedis as non- Muslims and include clauses in the 1973 Constitution to enforce Sharia law is well known. Later, in 1983, General Zia accepted their demand of passing the Hudood Ordinances, which restrict women’s rights. The growing influence and importance of Islamists helped ambitious and bigoted politicians to benefit from the powerful card of religion. The result is a state divided on ethnic, cultural, linguist, sectarian and provincial lines. The state’s appeasement policy and pandering to the demands by reactionary forces has emboldened them and made them confident of their power to bring the country to a halt.
Extremism is the biggest enemy of the nation, which is not only weakening the already deteriorating governance system in the country but also undermining national dignity and Pakistan’s global image. Given the current religious insecurity, Pakistan has to redesign its narrative and soften its policies towards the religious bigots and extremists in order to stabilize the state. It is incumbent upon the state to ensure the supremacy of the Constitution and rule of law, which is an effective way to establish the writ of the state. The state institutions should not avoid going against the bigots who are able to sabotage peace and stability.
‘Extremism’ is a bogus concept coined by Western think-tanks in order to create a negative perception about those aspects of Islam that can stand in the way of their neo-imperial ambitions for the Muslim world. It is sad to see Pakistani intellectuals uncritically accept this narrative and start attacking the ideological foundations of their own countries.
It is a well-known fact that most of Pakistan’s problems are the creation of the musharraf era, and blaming them on Zia not only shows dishonesty but also intellectual laziness. Secondly, protests in all countries do sometimes become violent (for example consider the BLM protests in USA during which entire cities were burnt to the ground), which again shows that policies of Zia do not have anything to do with any of our current predicaments. Rather, most of our problems can be attributed to one big spectre – corruption. This is what has really eaten all our institutions and given us innumerable problems. The writer is well-advised to do some critical thinking and not just start peddling tired narratives copy-pasted from Indian propaganda sites.
LoL, you are deluded old boy. Support for extremists undoubtedly plays a major role in keeping the country from reaching her potential. That is true whatever role the western and eastern powers also bring to the matter.