LHC disposes petition filed against ECP’s delimitation notification

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) disposed of on Tuesday a petition challenging the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) delimitation notification.

The petitioner, Muhammad Muqsit Saleem, contended that the caretaker government setup was causing a delay in elections beyond the statutory period of 90 days.

He requested the court to declare the ECP’s impugned notification, issued on August 17, as ultra vires of the Constitution of Pakistan. He further requested the court to demand concerned respondents to stop following “unconstitutional directions” and take legitimate steps to ensure the implementation of the Constitution, which guarantees elections in 90 days.

Saleem had further asked the court to suspend the operation until the decision of this petition was announced.

During today’s proceedings, Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh questioned the petitioner’s counsel about why the president failed to announce election dates. “The situation would have been different today had the president announced the election date,” he remarked. “Is there any law under which the ECP can announce the election date?” he further asked.

The lawyer representing the ECP argued that the president can constitutionally not direct the ECP in this regard, but can announce an election date. However, Justice Sheikh stated that it is, in fact, the “constitutional obligation” of the president to give an election date.

The judge told the petitioner that his first question should have been about the election date instead of worrying about its delay.

The counsel responded that the ECP was rendering its role in accordance with the law, adding that the Constitution was “very clear” that elections will be conducted on the latest de-limitation record.

The petitioner challenged the ECP’s delimitation notification on the grounds that the delimitation process would delay the elections beyond the statutory period of 90 days. The time period is stipulated in Article 224 of the Constitution and Section 17(2) of the Elections Act.

He argued that the delimitation notification violates Section 17(2) of the Elections Act, since the limit of constituencies was already published by the commission on August 5, 2022. “A year has passed since then, the elected government’s tenure is over, and this caretaker setup is causing an illegal delay in the statutory period of elections,” he stated.

He further remarked that he understands that a caretaker government is appointed to oversee the country’s administration in the run-up to general elections, with the mandate to ensure free, fair and transparent elections, as well as to maintain law and order during the electoral process.

However, if elections are not held within the timeframe specified in the Constitution, the mandate of the caretaker government should typically end – but “it never is that simple in Pakistan, especially given the current political climate,” he had remarked.

The Constitution specifies 90 days and 60 days election periods. According to Article 224(1), a general election to the National Assembly or a provincial assembly must be held within 60 days of the day after an assembly’s term is set to expire.

According to Article 224(2), when the National Assembly or a provincial assembly is dissolved, general election must be held within 90 days of the dissolution and the result must be declared no later than 14 days after the polls close.

Must Read

FAST EROSION OF VALUES

In an age where human connection and expression increasingly find their voice in the digital ether, platforms like TikTok stand as paradoxical beacons of...

Brain Health of Women

Electric Vehicle Policy