ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) has invited all persons and organizations to disclose facts pertaining to the Faizabad sit-in by October 27, 2023 as the court will resume proceedings on eight review petitions filed against the February 2019 verdict on November 1.
In a written order issued on September 28, the court invited all individuals and parties – civil, private or governmental – to submit in writing through affidavits if they wish to disclose facts pertaining to the matter.
The court observed that “adjournments have been sought” and “certain parties are not in attendance” while “some have publicly stated that they knew what had happened, yet the judgment did not consider their point of view”.
“This is surprising given that it was noted in paragraph 17 of the judgment that: All the hearings in this case were conducted in open court. We had permitted those aggrieved and those whose interest may be affected to come forward and had also permitted them to file documents and written submission,” the apex court noted in its written order.
“In any event we are providing another opportunity to all to submit in writing through affidavits if they want to disclose facts pertaining to this matter. The learned AG [Attorney General of Pakistan] however states that the matter attends to events of a certain period and its scope should not be extended,” stated the written order.
Last week, as the court took up review petitions pending since 2019, a three-member bench led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and comprising Justice Aminuddin Khan as well as Justice Athar Minallah, it was informed that the Ministry of Defence, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) wished to withdraw their pleas.
Similar applications had earlier been filed by the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) while the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) and currently ‘detained’ Awami Muslim League leader Sheikh Rashid had sought adjournments citing various reasons for which their counsels could not appear.
In its written order, the top court recounted the questions that were raised at the previous hearing:
- Why the matter was not taken up by the apex court in the past four years
- The simultaneous filing of these review petitions and the reason behind doing so
- Whether constitutional and statutory bodies acted independently in filing the same
- Whether, as claimed by some, the February 2019 judgment has been implemented.
The apex court invited “any party or any one” to submit before it any facts they wish to disclose by October 27 before the matter resumes for hearing on November 1.
Several review petitions were filed against the verdict authored by now Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa on February 6, 2019. This judgment pertained to a sit-in staged by the Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) in Faizabad in 2017.
In this scathing judgment, authored by Justice Isa, it directed the country’s intelligence agencies, including the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Intelligence Bureau (IB), Military Intelligence (MI), and the army’s media wing, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), not to exceed their constitutional mandate.
The judgment specifically addressed the role of intelligence agencies during a 20-day sit-in organized by the TLP at the intersection of Rawalpindi and Islamabad in November 2017. The TLP had initiated the protest in response to alleged changes made in lawmakers’ oath, affirming that the Holy Prophet (PBUH) is the last messenger of Allah, through the Elections Bill 2017 – during the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) government. The protesters demanded the resignation of the then-law minister, Zahid Hamid.
These protests disrupted daily life in the twin cities for 20 days, leading to multiple rounds of negotiations between the government and protesters. Ultimately, Zahid Hamid resigned on November 27, 2017, meeting the TLP’s demands.
On November 21, 2017, the SC initiated suo motu proceedings regarding the sit-in. On November 22, 2018, a two-judge bench comprising Justice Isa and Justice Mushir Alam reserved their ruling. The Supreme Court unveiled its 43-page judgment authored by Justice Isa on February 6, 2019.
