Critical analysis of Saudi-Iran rapprochement

The rapprochement might not last long

Iran and Saudi relations have been differing over numerous geopolitical issues, for instance, the ambitions for dominance in the region, oil export policies, and relations with the Western powers, specifically the USA. The two contenders Iran (with a majority of Shia Muslims) and Saudi Arabia (with a majority of Sunni Muslims) have indulged in proxy wars for years and have backed opposing sides in Yemen, Iraq, Bahrain, Lebanon and Syria.

After years of animosity, the two biggest rivals of the Middle East decided to mend their differences and re-establish diplomatic ties last year. The deal was brokered by China on March 10, between the leading officials of both nations. It will have an enormous impact on the Middle East, leading to major developments in the region. However, it might face some challenges given the presence of non-state actors, religious differences, and Saudi Arabia’s solid stance on Iran’s nuclear programme.

The tensions date back to the 1979 revolution of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini which resulted in the formation of an Islamic Republic in Iran. The Saudi monarchy which grounded its validity on Islam, feared the expansionist vision of Khomeini. In the subsequent years, the two neighboring countries embarked on a petulant rivalry brimming with moments of crisis and hostility.

Estimates show that the Al-Saud family spent around $100 billion on their evangelical cause. On the other hand, Iran established Shia groups, for instance, Hezbollah, and the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain, to challenge the regional order. Such tactics revealed that both sides positioned Islam at the heart of political and security designs in the region.

After a long-standing rivalry, many efforts were made by Iraq and Oman to host talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran. However, the reconciliation brought about by China is central to the debate, as we observe the power competition between the USA and China. Saudi Arabia plans are much beyond the effort to get involved in US-China rivalry, for instance, Vision-2030 contains a lot of economic projects which are arduous unilaterally, hence the country requires the support of other regional and global actors– to this end, the peace deal has a lot of importance for Saudi Arabia. In addition, it carries much-needed relief to millions of people living in the Middle East who were distressed by sectarian violence instigated by Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Despite the cultural, religious and ideological differences, both Saudi and Iran had long friendly relations before 1979, which shows that through peace and cooperation, the two neighbours can become a source of regional stability and development. Both sides should engage in peaceful ways to achieve their objectives– the door of diplomacy is always open.

Similarly, it would provide an opportunity for economic cooperation on various projects. Given that both countries are resource-rich and have substantial economic potential, the peace deal would allow Saudi and Iran to collaborate in multiple sectors such as energy, communication, climate change, transportation and trade in the region. Besides, the deal may open a door for security dialogues among other regional actors, in particular, Iran and Iraq which have a long history of conflicts and proxy wars with Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi-Iran rapprochement possibly reduces the security concerns of the Middle East; however, it seems to be a temporary agreement which might break at any point. First, Saudi Arabia has a solid stance on Iran’s nuclear programme. Last year, Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman stated in an interview with US Television that Saudi Arabia will also go for a nuclear weapon if Iran acquires one. Though Iran may not intend to deter Saudi Arabia with nuclear weapons, both states have a huge adversarial past– a little escalation in a crisis will bring the two sides to the brink of war.

Secondly, the peace deal might be compromised due to the menace of religious divergence. The differences of opinion might serve as the cause of rivalry in the future, given that both Shiites and Sunnis possess diverse views on Islam. It is a well-known fact that the expansionist policies of Khomeini threatened the Saudi leadership which led to high-level tensions between the two parties. Therefore, as long as religion remains in the political fabric of these two states, the peace deal may not help in achieving a long-lasting peace

Moreover, the period after the Arab Spring in 2011 witnessed an astonishing proliferation of non-state actors in the Middle East due to their increased significance in the region. These organizations have undoubtedly performed an important role in campaigns that led to the demise of autocratic regimes in Libya, Yemen, Egypt, and Tunisia. Above all, these groups were supported militarily by Saudi and Iran to pursue their own interests in the region. As a consequence, the presence of these non-state actors may compromise the relations of Saudi and Iran in the future.

In conclusion, the Saudi-Iran rapprochement plays an important role in shaping the future of the Middle East. It may lead to further agreements and negotiations over security issues between the regional actors. Ranging from technological and economic aspects to climate change initiatives, Saudi Arabia and Iran may use the deal as an opportunity to enhance cooperation in these crucial sectors by mutual efforts. Nevertheless, due to the threat of crisis escalation, the deal may not continue for long. The struggle for dominance between Riyadh and Tehran is not a hidden fact any more.

Despite the cultural, religious and ideological differences, both Saudi and Iran had long friendly relations before 1979, which shows that through peace and cooperation, the two neighbours can become a source of regional stability and development. Both sides should engage in peaceful ways to achieve their objectives– the door of diplomacy is always open.

Muhtasim Afridi
Muhtasim Afridi
The writer is a research intern at the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad; he can be reached at: [email protected]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Why people would take to streets for Imran who did nothing...

LONDON: PML-N President Nawaz Sharif Friday reacted to jailed PTI founder Imran Khan's "final protest call", arguing why people would take to the streets...