ISLAMABAD: Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) MNA Noor Alam Khan has submitted a bill in the National Assembly (NA) against dual citizenship of government officers, claiming that the officers escape accountability after fleeing to foreign nations post-retirement.
The bill stated that an individual holding dual nationality or foreign citizenship should not be given right to be appointed as a civil servant.
Interestingly, the draft bill states that a dual-national individual shall not be appointed as a Supreme Court (SC) or a High Court (HC) judge – perhaps pointed to target higher judiciary.
Through the proposed bill, MNA Noor Alam sought changes in the Civil Servants Act, 1973’s Section 5, calling it “Civil Servants (Amendment) Bill, 2024”.
“Provided that a civil servant holding dual nationality or citizenship of any foreign country shall not be entitled for appointment,” reads the bill.
Elaborating on reasons behind seeking the modification, Noor Alam stated: “Government servants must have their stakes in the country in which they hold positions of authority, privilege and trust.”
He added that his proposed amendments would “ensure the loyalty of government servants in the light of Article 5 of the Constitution”.
The development comes after MNA Noor sought a constitutional amendment to impose a complete ban on the appointment of judges in the higher judiciary who are dual nationals.
On Tuesday, the lawmaker also submitted a Constitutional (Amendment) Bill, 2024, to the NA Secretariat which has sought modifications in the Constitution’s Articles 177, 193, and 208, shutting all legal routes to the appointments of those judges, who have foreign nationalities.
It also sought to block the passage to the appointments of foreign nationals as judiciary officers and servants as well.
It also read: “Those who hold dual nationality of foreign states, putting at stake the interest of the country of their origin.”
Urging the legislature to promulgate the proposed law, the JUI-F lawmaker said there is a need to ensure the loyalty of the judges in the light of Article 5 of the Constitution, and his proposed amendments will achieve the objectives.
