Following Israel’s attack in Khiara in Lebanon’s eastern Bekaa area and Hezbollah’s drone attack on Beit Hillel, northern Israel, in response to the attack which resulted in the assassination of the Jamma Islamiya group’s commander in Lebanon, the tension between Hezbollah and Israel has heated up. The exchange of fire between them has been ongoing since October 8 in order to compel Israel to stop the Gaza massacre. In the conflict, about 350 Hezbollah fighters and more than 90 Lebanese civilians have been killed so far, while in Israel, 15 soldiers and 10 civilians have been killed, but after the assassination, the situation has been exacerbated. Both of them claim readiness for an all-out war, but the diplomatic resolution of the tension is underway. Here questions arise: will Israel afford to open another front to war? Can Hezbollah outsmart Israel? Will the USA support Israel? Can the region afford another war? Is another cataclysm in the making?
Greater war will not be affordable by both sides and the entire region since it will result in the devastation of much of Lebanon and major infrastructure in Israel, so averting greater war will be in favour of both sides. And it can help a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas because one of the core rationales behind Hezbollah’s war is to stop Israel from destroying the entire Gaza
The exchange of fire between Israel and Hezbollah has constrained denizens to flee from both sides of Israel and Lebanon. More than 90,000 Israelis have fled their homes in the north of the country since the skirmish triggered with Hezbollah on October 8, and at least 90,000 people have also fled their homes in southern Lebanon after Israeli attacks. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is under domestic pressure to drive Hezbollah from the border and allow displaced residents to return to their homes in Israel’s north as the school year approaches, and they are under fear that they won’t be able to live in security as long as Hezbollah operates nearby.
The Israeli public wants both things: returning to their homes and military operations against Hezbollah, which seem difficult to achieve within months, also Bibi is unable to move some forces to the north because of the ongoing massacre in Gaza. Here, it is noteworthy that Hezbollah has claimed it will mitigate tensions with Israel if the genocide in Gaza is terminated. Besides, Hezbollah has warned Cyprus, a member of the European Union, that if it opens Cypriot airports and bases for the Israeli forces to target Lebanon, it means that the Cypriot government has become part of the war and will be dealt with accordingly.
However, another front for all-out war is a herculean task for Israel for some reasons. Firstly, its forces are engaged in heavy fighting with Hamas in north and central Gaza, which cannot be moved to the northern side of Israel to engage in war with Hezbollah for the time being. But some experts opine that Israel can open another front, but the financial and human costs will be immense. Secondly, the Israeli defense system’s Iron Dome anti-missile batteries are at risk of being overwhelmed in the opening strikes of any escalated tussle with Hezbollah. Thirdly, the assessment by US officials and recent analysis by experts in Israel and the US are replete with fears that a war with Hezbollah could be far more devastating than the 2006 second Lebanon war. Last but not least, the dearth of military aid from the US that renders Israel incapable of fighting a greater war. Netanyahu declared in a video that in the past few months, the administration has been withholding weapons and ammunition from Israel. The statement was dubbed perplexing by US officials since they noted that only one weapons shipment had been paused since the inception of the war, while billions of dollars of weapons had flowed unimpeded. The conflict of statements depicts that Israel does not have enough weapons and ammunition to wage a full-scale war with Hezbollah.
Apart, Hezbollah is not the same as in the 2006 war. It has improved its skills at fighting war. In Syria, they gained new skills in urban warfare and intelligence. Its Special Forces unit is trained to infiltrate Israel in the event of a war that will surely provide ground for Hezbollah to inflict serious damage to Israel. Despite being outmatched but capable of inflicting considerable cost on Israel. Recently, Hezbollah published drone footage of an Israeli military base at the port of Haifa, exposing possible vulnerabilities in the country’s air defense system.
According to that video, potential targets include Israel’s main airport, Ben Gurion, power plants in Ashkelon and Hadera, the leviathan gas field, a plutonium-based facility in Dimona, a large natural gas field in the Mediterranean Sea, and Ashdod. Besides, Hezbollah has exponentially expanded its arsenal and capabilities, including a widely expanded array of missiles, which experts believe are between 120,000 and 200,000, an anti-aircraft missile capability, and suicide drones, which Israel has struggled to counter.
Additionally, in the second war in Lebanon in 2006, Israel damaged Lebanon overwhelmingly, killing more than 1200 Lebanese, including 250 fighters, and destroying 30,000 homes, 109 bridges, and 78 medical facilities, according to the International Committee for the Red Cross. Hezbollah could only kill 165 nationals of Israel. However, the number of the Hezbollah fighters was 3,000 to 5,000 and they had short-range missiles to hit Israel. But, since then, the number of Hezbollah fighters has expanded to about 60,000, and it has acquired rockets and missiles in huge numbers, so it is obvious that if Hezbollah cannot defeat Israel, it can surely inflict a terrible loss to Israel. As a result, Israel can reduce much of Lebanon to rubble. Notwithstanding that the Israeli military seems to be acquainted with Hezbollah’s capabilities, many in Israel, including some far-right ministers, are pushing for military solutions over diplomacy- even one of them gave the idea of reoccupying south Lebanon.
The USA seems unwilling to assist Israel in a full-blown war. As per US officials, it would not be able to help Israel against a wider war with Hezbollah in an effective manner, as it helped Israel fight off an Iranian barrage of missiles and drones in April. In this regard, the USA is continuously in talks with Israeli leaders and is warning against widening the conflict. Apart from this, the USA is unable to provide adequate military aid to Israel to engage in an all-out war with Hezbollah, so it is attempting to resolve the matter diplomatically. For this, the US’s special envoy, Amos Hochstein, has made visits to the region to curtail any chances of an all-out war.
Greater war will not be affordable by both sides and the entire region since it will result in the devastation of much of Lebanon and major infrastructure in Israel, so averting greater war will be in favour of both sides. And it can help a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas because one of the core rationales behind Hezbollah’s war is to stop Israel from destroying the entire Gaza.
