The focus of the national discourse, for better or worse, has shifted from the civilian leadership— the PML(N), PPP, JUI(F), and most importantly, Imran Khan— to the Army after the high-profile arrest of Lt Gen (retd) Faiz Hameed and his accomplices. These arrests were related to charges outlined in a short but fully loaded press release by the ISPR, which stated that, in connection with the FGCM proceedings of General Faiz, three retired officers are also in military custody for actions prejudicial to military discipline. Further investigations into certain retired officers and their accomplices for fomenting instability at the behest of, and in collusion with, vested political interests are ongoing.”
This press release opened up an entire Pandora’s box and unleashed a genie that engulfed the entire nation, reverberating around the globe. It immediately took centre stage in the national discourse, dominating media discussions and shifting focus, which had previously revolved around the judiciary and PTI on one side, and the Parliament and establishment government on the other. The high-profile arrest and its repercussions triggered a storm of rumors, hearsay, speculation, and the crafting of numerous scenarios by every analyst and commentator.
The entire episode was triggered by the events of May 9. The Army took action against many serving and retired officers soon after the incident. This fresh wave of arrests, coming nearly a year later, reflects the ongoing investigation. According to the press release, all individuals— whether civilian or military, retired or serving— who masterminded the events of May 9, along with those who aided in fomenting instability at the behest of and in collusion with vested political interests, will eventually be arrested and subjected to punishment commensurate with the severity of their crimes
One analyst, in a moment of emotion, rushed to link the May 9 incident with the arrest, claiming that the PTI chief had been instrumental in promoting and encouraging mutiny within the Army by inciting junior officers to rise against the senior leadership. He demanded accountability for all serving and retired Army officers, as well as the former PTI chairman, seemingly forgetting that the former chairman’s accountability had been initiated in August and is ongoing without any end in sight.
Another commentator argued that the allegations levelled against General Faiz and his accomplices carry no political weight, as it is not a crime for a retired Army officer to meet or establish connections with any incarcerated political figure.
A third analyst painted an even more alarming scenario. He suggested that the entire plan was masterminded by General Faiz, who identified military targets around the country. According to this theory, he had cultivated serving officers of the armed forces manning these installations and planted his own trained people among the mobs that attacked them. The idea was to create chaos from both inside and outside, leading to the replacement of the Army leadership loyal to the COAS and the establishment of a new order.
Politicians, in their individual capacities, are also trying to settle personal vendettas and advance their agendas. Some are attempting to link the entire issue of military indiscipline to former Army Chief Gen (retd) Qamar Javed Bajwa, demanding his accountability above all else. They are also speculating, with no solid evidence, that since General Bajwa was not invited to a recent dinner hosted by the COAS for retired officers, he may be next in line to face consequences.
Some politicians are taking this opportunity to argue that there has been accountability for army officers, civil servants, and politicians, and that now it is time to hold judges accountable, bringing to justice those who have violated their oaths and judicial codes of conduct. Others are expressing their desire to invoke Article 6 against the PTI chairman for allegedly fomenting mutiny within the armed forces and calling for his trial under the army courts.
Amongst these speculative and mostly unvalidated observations and imaginary scenarios, let us try to get the clarity of the Army’s standpoint by decoding the ISPR’s Press Release. It used the acronym “FGCM” which stands for “Field General Court Martial”. It is a type of military court used to try members of the armed forces who are accused of serious offences. The Field General Court Martial is the highest level of court martial in the military justice system, typically dealing with grave charges such as mutiny, treason, desertion, or other severe breaches of military law. The proceedings are conducted by senior military officers, and the court has the authority to impose significant penalties, including imprisonment and even the death penalty, depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the offence.
The Press Release used the phrase that “three retired officers are in military custody for actions “prejudicial to military discipline,” it means that these officers are being held by military authorities because they are suspected of engaging in activities or conduct that undermined or harmed the discipline, order, or integrity of the armed forces. Even though they are retired, these officers are subjected to military law if their actions are deemed serious enough to warrant it, especially if those actions took place while they were still in service or if the offences are linked to military matters. Being in military custody suggests that they are being investigated or possibly facing legal proceedings within the military justice system for these alleged offences.
The last para indicated said that, “Further investigations of certain retired officers and their accomplices for fomenting instability at the behest of and in collusion with vested political interests are continuing”. This means that ongoing investigations are being conducted into the actions of certain retired military officers and their accomplices. These investigations focus on their alleged involvement in creating or promoting instability, such as disorder, unrest, or challenges to the established order.
The phrase “at the behest of and in collusion with vested political interests” suggests that these retired officers and their accomplices are believed to have acted under the direction or influence of specific political groups or individuals who have a particular interest in causing instability for their own benefit. “Collusion” implies that these parties worked together, likely in a secretive or deceptive manner, to achieve this shared goal of destabilizing the situation.
Now that we have deciphered the press release to a large extent, let’s try to put it in proper perspective. The entire episode was triggered by the events of May 9. The Army took action against many serving and retired officers soon after the incident. This fresh wave of arrests, coming nearly a year later, reflects the ongoing investigation. According to the press release, all individuals— whether civilian or military, retired or serving— who masterminded the events of May 9, along with those who aided in fomenting instability at the behest of and in collusion with vested political interests, will eventually be arrested and subjected to punishment commensurate with the severity of their crimes.
