— No student has any evidence of alleged Lahore rape, Punjab lawyer tells LHC
LAHORE: Punjab’s state counsel told the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Friday that students alleging the rape of a college student in Lahore “had no evidence” to support the claim.
Last week, reports related to the alleged rape of a private college student went viral on social media, prompting the police to arrest a security guard at the college who was allegedly involved in the incident.
Enraged by the alleged incident, students mobilised on social media and staged protests outside different colleges in Lahore over the past few days, resulting in at least 28 being injured on Monday. Demonstrations also spread to other parts of Punjab, as the police arrested more than 380 protesters against the alleged incident in Rawalpindi.
Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz has declared that the alleged rape was “fabricated news”, blaming the PTI for spreading the “fake reports” on social media. Punjab Group of Colleges (PGC) group Director Agha Tahir and other office-holders have also termed the incident “baseless”.
Faced with the double challenge of a possible agitation by the PTI and students’ protest today, the Punjab government has banned all public gatherings for two days as Section 144 has been imposed across the province.
Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is a legal provision that empowers district administrations to prohibit an assembly of four or more people in an area for a limited period. It is usually imposed to prevent potential disturbances, maintain law and order, and curb any activities that might escalate into violence.
All public and private educational institutions across Punjab will also remain closed on Friday.
LHC Chief Justice Aalia Neelum resumed hearing a petition filed earlier this week against the alleged harassment of female students in Punjab’s educational institutions.
Upon being summoned by the LHC, Punjab Inspector General of Police (IG) Dr Usman Anwar and Advocate General of Punjab Khalid Ishaq appeared before the court.
“Every student is saying that the assault took place but no one had any evidence,” Ishaq told the court.
During the hearing, Justice Neelum censured the Punjab IG for not being able to stop videos on different matters from spreading, saying that it was his “failure” that students had taken to the streets.
The LHC chief justice then decided that the matter of harassment of students and a separate ongoing case of Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari’s fake videos be clubbed together and heard by a full bench on October 22.
Separately, the Cyber Crime Wing of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) carried out province-wide raids yesterday for the arrest of some senior journalists, lawyers, and TikTokers, arresting three of them for allegedly spreading false information on social media regarding the incident.
The case was registered in light of an inquiry conducted by the cyber crime wing of the FIA (Lahore) on the complaint of Punjab College for Women (Gulberg) Principal Sadia Yousuf.
At the outset of the hearing, Justice Neelum asked IG Anwar, “Why were the videos not prevented from spreading [on social media]? Did you approach any authority to stop the videos [from being spread]?”
The Punjab police chief replied he had approached the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). The chief justice then noted that the videos went viral on October 13 and 14, remarking: “You wake up when the fire has been set alight when everything has been burned.”
“Did you contact the relevant authorities very late?” she asked, to which the Punjab IG replied that more than 700 accounts were involved in sharing the videos. He stressed that the police “only have one agency to oversee cybercrime”.
“IG sahib, this is your failure that you let the children take to the streets,” Justice Neelum observed.
She asked the Punjab police chief to give an account of what the police did on October 14 and 15, noting that some videos were still present on the platforms of X and TikTok.
“The documents you have submitted [show] you did nothing for two days and started work on October 16,” the chief justice observed. “If there’s a will, all work gets done.”
In his defence, the Punjab IG contended that it was “not easy to stop the data from being uploaded”, highlighting that the police did not have the authority to do so.
“If we stop it from one account, it is reposted from another,” IG Anwar lamented.
Here, the chief justice asked the Punjab advocate general: “If something [unfortunate] had happened to the girls who took to the streets, who would have been responsible?”
The advocate general informed the court: “An Instagram post on October 12 said that the rape of a girl had taken place in a private college. The SSP (senior superintendent of police) reached the campus concerned the same day and began investigating.
“The first-year students have their own WhatsApp groups, which are not controlled by anyone. The Instagram post was shared in every group but no one knew what had happened,” he added.
At this point, the Punjab IG said that the police had identified more than 700 social media accounts. Upon his mentioning that even England “did not have the power to stop uploading” content, Justice Neelum told him to not state England as an example.
