Pakistan’s firewall and its digital consequences

The state mustn’t go overboard

In an era marked by unprecedented digital interconnectedness and unrestricted flow of information, nation states around the world are faced with the nuanced task of balancing national security with the preservation of civil liberties. This balancing act reveals a paradox in international relations: the very freedoms central to democracies, like open communication and association, can also be exploited by those aiming to destabilise the state.

Pakistan’s recent deployment of a national firewall has added fuel to this debate. Modelled, in part, after China’s extensive “Great Firewall”, Pakistan’s digital barrier has raised concerns over state oversight, online freedom, and the future of Pakistan’s digital landscape. However, as Pakistan initiates the implementation of its national firewall, the potential to create a more secure and resilient digital landscape is within reach, encouraging a more proactive approach to deal with complexities of cybersecurity.

The rationale behind the firewall is simple: protecting Pakistan’s digital infrastructure, regulating access to harmful content, and preventing cybercrime. Therefore, by utilising technologies, such as deep packet inception and keyword filters, Pakistan aims to block content that is harmful, potentially limiting access to popular social media platforms, such as Facebook, YouTube, and X. In 2013, Pakistan took an initial step in this direction by installing content filters across PTCL’s cable. Iteration of today is more advanced and uses sophisticated equipment capable of blocking unwanted content, managing IP addresses, and if implemented fully, disabling Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).

Foreign actors have increasingly targeted Pakistan with misinformation and disinformation campaigns, stirring social unrest and distrust in the government. Therefore, Pakistan’s firewall partly responds to these threats, aiming to curb harmful foreign-backed narratives. A well configured firewall could serve as a formidable barrier against unauthorised access to Pakistan’s network. By sitting between the network and potential intruders, it could establish multiple layers of security to control access. This protection extends safeguarding against threats such as spyware, malware, and adware. In this way, the firewall becomes the first line of defence, helping shield sensitive information from external exploitation.

However, despite the government’s assurances that the firewall is a protective measure for national security, it has sparked considerable alarm among the general masses, who view this initiative as a direct threat to freedom of expression. Moreover, the economic impact of the firewall cannot be overlooked. Pakistan’s tech and freelance sectors, which collectively support thousands of jobs and generate substantial revenue, are feeling the strain of increased internet disruptions.

According to Pakistan Software Houses Associations, internet issues have cost the nation over $300 million in lost productivity and opportunities. Freelancers reliant on international platforms face delays and account suspensions, which not only threatens their livelihoods, but also jeopardises Pakistan’s reputation in the global outsourcing market.

All in all, in an age where misinformation, cyber threats and harmful content are global challenges, Pakistan efforts to implement regulatory frameworks show a commitment to tackling issues head-on. However, Pakistan must exercise vigilance and restraint, to ensure that its digital landscape remains a safe space for innovation, exchange, and progress.

Firewall restriction also complicates matters for businesses that are reliant on secure digital communications. For example, a potential crackdown on VPNs could limit the tools used by companies to protect proprietary data, and communicate securely. Additionally, concerns over privacy are mounting as firewall grants authorities sweeping access to personal data.

Therefore, implementing a firewall involves more than just deploying software and hardware, requiring significant technological and operational adjustments. In this regard, Pakistan can learn valuable lessons from strategies employed by other countries to address similar challenges.

First, striking a balance between efficient filtering and minimal interference with legitimate traffic is a difficult task. Therefore, firewalls must be sensitive enough to avoid “false positives” that disrupt daily internet use. For example, China’s Great Firewall employs complex algorithms to access and filter data in real time; however, such sophistication comes at high operational cost. This suggests that Pakistan should consider implementing targeted and efficient filtering strategy that prioritises user experience while addressing security concerns.

Second, circumvention tools like VPNs and proxies are common methods to bypass controls and access the restricted contents. In response, countries like Russia has banned popular VPNs and imposed fines on tech companies that fail to comply with national firewall policies. However, such bans are often met with popular resistance. Therefore, rather than outright banning VPNs, Pakistan could require VPN providers to register with authorities, thereby balancing control and public access.

Third, gaining public trust is a critical challenge for effective firewall implementation. To gain the confidence of its citizens, the government must demonstrate transparency in its objectives, and this should be complemented by efforts to educate citizens on digital literacy. Such efforts would not only foster digital awareness and build trust, demonstrating the government’s commitment to empowering citizens through knowledge and transparency. Some countries, like Finland and Germany, involve civil society in discussions around digital policies to align with public interests. Pakistan could adopt a similar approach, thereby curbing public resistance.

All in all, in an age where misinformation, cyber threats and harmful content are global challenges, Pakistan efforts to implement regulatory frameworks show a commitment to tackling issues head-on. However, Pakistan must exercise vigilance and restraint, to ensure that its digital landscape remains a safe space for innovation, exchange, and progress.

Faiza
Faiza
Faiza Abid is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Lahore. She can be reached at [email protected]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Imran wants a clear timeframe for results on PTI’s demands: Barrister...

PTI Chairman confirms talks with Imran Khan focused solely on negotiations with no mention of civil disobedience Says PTI to present a comprehensive...