Prince Harry’s ongoing battle over his UK security arrangements could take inspiration from a precedent involving pop superstar Taylor Swift. In August, Swift received police escorts for her sold-out Wembley Stadium performances on her record-breaking Eras Tour. This heightened security followed a serious terror threat that caused the cancellation of several tour dates in Austria.
Prince Harry, 40, has been fighting for the restoration of his automatic right to security since stepping back as a senior royal with Meghan Markle in 2020. After an unfavorable ruling in April, he is pursuing an appeal, with a court hearing scheduled for spring 2025.
A source familiar with the situation told PEOPLE that Harry is determined to protect his family while in the UK. “He wants his children to know their father’s homeland without fear,” the source shared, adding that Harry also seeks to focus on his charitable work in a secure environment.
The source emphasized a perceived inconsistency in how the UK authorities allocate security resources, pointing to Swift’s police escorts as a notable example. “The government’s decision to provide armed police for Taylor Swift’s Wembley shows raises questions about fairness and transparency in security decisions,” the insider stated.
The issue has further strained Prince Harry’s relationship with King Charles. During a brief UK visit in May, Harry reportedly hoped to discuss the matter with his father, believing Charles could influence security arrangements. However, a palace source has refuted this, calling such claims “wholly incorrect.” Buckingham Palace has consistently declined to comment on security issues, citing operational confidentiality.
Harry’s legal team argues that his military service, high-profile status, and marriage to Meghan Markle, who has faced serious threats, justify heightened security measures. Neil Basu, the former head of counterterrorism for the Metropolitan Police, previously confirmed that both Harry and Meghan faced significant risks, describing their threat levels as among the highest within the royal family.
The decision to downgrade Harry and Meghan’s security was made by RAVEC, a committee comprising members from the UK Home Office, the Metropolitan Police, and the Royal Household. While the King himself has no direct involvement, his staff participates in RAVEC deliberations. The government maintains that security decisions are “rigorous and proportionate,” though details remain confidential to protect individuals and their safety protocols.
As the legal fight continues, Harry is steadfast in his commitment to ensuring his family’s safety and addressing what he views as an unfair and inconsistent system for determining security needs.
