iGaming in Pakistan – legislation and future directions

In Pakistan, online gaming follows a complex framework formed by developing technology, historical pinpoints, and religious aspects. Thorough research is required to analyse the situation with the related legislation, the landscape, and the potential future. The process includes considering existing laws, enforcement practices, societal mindsets, and occurring discussions on restrictions.

Historical Legal Framework

The Prevention of Gambling Act, 1977, is the main element presenting the basis of Pakistani gaming laws. This Act outlaws all forms of gambling, like betting and related activities. Penalties under this law vary based on the nature of the offence:

  • Operating a Gaming Establishment: Individuals found owning or managing a typical gaming venue may face fines up to 1,000 Rupees, imprisonment for up to one year, or both.
  • Participation in Gaming Activities: Those caught playing in such establishments can incur fines up to 5,000 Rupees, imprisonment for up to one year, or both.
  • Public Gaming: Engaging in such activites in public places can lead to fines of up to 500 Rupees, imprisonment for up to one year, or both.

The Act also authorises law enforcement agencies to search and seize properties suspected of facilitating such activities. Notably, the legislation provides exceptions for tourist complexes regulated by provincial governments, accessible exclusively to foreigners.

Online Gaming: A Legal Gray Area

The 1977 Act does not explicitly address online gaming. It predates the advent of the Internet, but the general prohibition has been interpreted to encompass online platforms. The advancement of digital tech has led to increased participation in that niche, often through international websites. Despite efforts by Pakistani authorities to block access to such platforms, many users employ virtual private networks (VPNs) to bypass restrictions. To find the safest online gaming sites, you can check dhoka.info for reference.

Religious and Cultural Context

The local legal standpoint on gambling is deeply rooted in Islamic principles. They categorise gambling (maisir) as haram (forbidden). This religious perspective strongly influences society and judicial approaches to playing games of chance. Consequently, there is substantial resistance to legalising gaming activities, including online gaming, as they are perceived to conflict with cultural and religious values. 

Comparative Perspectives

Pakistan’s neighbouring countries exhibit diverse legislation strategies influenced by economic, cultural, and religious factors. India separates these laws by state. In Bangladesh, gambling is illegal, but the enforcement is relatively loose, leading to grey area activities. In contrast, China broadly prohibits gambling, except in specific administrative regions like Macau, where it is a significant factor for revenue and economics. 

Future Directions and Potential Reforms

There are limited debates regarding the legalisation and regulations of the Pakistani online gaming market. The administration remains loyal to Islamic principles regarding land-based and online casinos. Still, the fast development of digital technologies and the increasing popularity of this business present challenges to existing legal frameworks. Some experts suggest that regulating the market could:

  • Generate Revenue: It could lead to tax revenues, as observed in countries with a regulated gaming industry.
  • Boost Consumer Protection: Regulations could ensure fairness, prevent exploitation, and support problem gamblers.
  • Create Job Opportunities: A regulated industry will open thousands of job positions in both the land-based and online sectors.
  • Restrain Illegal Actions: That could decrease most underground gaming operations and associated criminal activities.

Despite these arguments, there is no indication of upcoming legislative transformations. The government’s focus remains on enforcing existing laws.

Cryptocurrency and the Legal Loophole in Online Gaming Regulations

Despite the strict Pakistani laws, the rise of cryptocurrency-based online gaming has created a legal gray area. Since the Prevention of Gambling Act of 1977 does not explicitly cover digital currencies, many users turn to crypto and other virtual assets to fund accounts on offshore platforms. While the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) previously declared cryptocurrency illegal, recent developments indicate a possible shift. 

The Virtual Assets Bill 2025 was introduced in Parliament, aiming to regulate digital assets and introduce a Digital Rupee. This bill is still under review, so cryptocurrency remains unregulated. This lack of clarity allows players to bypass local banking restrictions and register on international platforms.

If Pakistan moves toward formal regulation of digital assets, future legislation will need to address crypto transactions linked to betting activities. Countries like India and the UK are already implementing measures to monitor and tax cryptocurrency gaming.

Since Bill 2025 has not yet become a law, cryptocurrency-based gaming remains in a legal loophole, neither explicitly allowed nor effectively policed. Until the government enforces specific regulations, offshore platforms will continue operating outside Pakistan’s legal framework, making enforcement a significant challenge.

Conclusion

The gaming laws in Pakistan remain strict, but cryptocurrency-based casino actions have created a legal loophole. The Virtual Assets Bill 2025 may regulate digital currencies, but gaming remains unaddressed. Without clear decrees, offshore platforms will continue operating unchecked. No immediate legislative changes are expected in 2025, but future reforms must tackle all types of casino and sports platforms and related crypto transactions. 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Trump urges Iran to hold ‘direct talks’ on nukes deal

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Thursday he wanted "direct talks" with Tehran on a nuclear deal, after he threatened to bomb Iran if...