Sharif’s Model of the Trickledown Economy

‘Trickle-Up’ economics

The third usurper, General Ziaul Haq, launched Nawaz Sharif in politics to counter the progressive appeal of Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s Party (PPP). At that time Mian Muhammad Sharif was head of the Ittefaq Group, a midsized businessman of Lahore who was ferociously against the socialist policies of Bhutto, under which his foundry in Kot Lakhpat had been nationalized. Once I had the chance of traveling with Awami National Party (ANP) leader Comrade Ajmal Khattak. As it was a long transAtlantic flight, I had the chance to discuss politics with him. In answer to my question about his alliance with Nawaz and his right of centre party, he said this was mainly for improving the economy. With the collapse of the USSR, most Socialists were lost. While China opted for reforms, only Cuba and North Korea kept the old system going. The Zia-Sharif nexus was for a new Economic Order. Zia even denationalized their primitive foundry in Lahore whle holding back the much advanced outfit next door called BECO (Batala Engineering Company).

Margerat Thatcher in the UK and Ronald Reagan in the USA both introduced the concept of ‘trickledown’, which meant favoring the rich to expand and invest, hoping for the crumbs to fall. Deregulation and receding state role was the approach. It was called ‘ Thatcherism ‘ and ‘Reaganomics’. The net result was a skewed distribution of wealth, as the rich got richer while the poor sank. It is widely argued that Bhutto’s nationalization of functioning industrial units was disastrous for the economy but it was during this period that basic industrialization took place, like the steel mill, fertilizer complexes, defence production, revamping of the atomic energy programme, mineral and oil exploration and so on. The big question is with no major project launch from 1977 to 2018, what have been the economic gains as envisioned by Comrade Ajmal Khattak and his left-of-centre progressive party?

As an intern metallurgist, I had the opportunity of working at Ittefaq Foundry which was called LEFO (Lahore Engineering and Foundry) after nationalization. It was a primitive factory where cow dung was being used for mould making. It was a 19th century outfit where employees worked in sub-human conditions. While BECO was founded by C.M. Latif, a very able and competent engineer, by contrast Ittefaq was run by skilled lohars (Ironsmiths) whose sole aim seeked to make quick profits with minimum input. After gaining political power, Mian Sharif the shrewd businessman decided to create the Sharif Group leaving his brothers behind. While he created the Takht-e-Lahore, the entire country became his canvas. The Ittefaq Foundry was finally dismantled and its land sold as plots.

While the world has suffered at the hands of the ‘ Trickledown ‘ mode, Pakstan has been plundered through the ‘Trickle Up ‘ bluff in the garb of economic development. The ‘ Zia-Sharif Economic ‘ model has to be dismantled as the ground realities are very grim. For the last 40 years, the PML(N) has been plundering the wealth of the nation like an invading army which it is not, though it was launched by the military in the 1980s, resulting in a disastrous economic meltdown.

Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) a party that was launched from the Muslim League House on Davis Road, has no political ideology. It is an outfit of interests not politics. Instead of the traditional ‘Trickledown Capitalist Ecoonomic Model’ it came up with their own  ‘Resources Usurpation Model’ or  ‘Loot Sharing Mode’. Plots, permits, loans, SROs, conflicts of interest,  development at state expense and so on are all inclusive. While in the ‘Trickle Down’ mode, expansion and wealth generation takes place at the top hoping for the crumbs to fall.

The Sharif model was unique in many ways. After gaining political power, they introduced a ‘Trickle Up’ approach. Massive loot and plunder took place at all levels. Only invading armies indulge in such a usurpation. After some research I could only come up with two names in the entire party, and both of them have also now been accused of wrongdoing. Ahsan Iqbal, the Secretary General of the party, faces NAB Reference for building the Narowal Sports Complex in violation of rules as it was a domain of the provincial government. Senator Pervaiz Rashid was not allowed to contest the elections as he had defaulted in payments to the Punjab House where he used to stay. In other words almost  every important player of the PML(N) has benefitted from this ‘Lootcracy’ or ‘Trickle Up’ of the assets of the state, to favor a few at the cost of many including the collapse of vital institutions that were trampled in the process.

The approach is very simple. They should all declare their family assets in 1985 when they entered the political arena and reconcile them with their current wealth. Money trails have to be provided. The ‘Ittefaq Group’ (Mian Sharif and his six brothers) first moved from a three-marla house in Gawalmandi to the industrial area on Ferozepur Road adjoining Model Town. An NOC was obtained for residential use of the plot. Seven mansions were built to accommodate all the brothers who worked together in the Foundry close by in Kot Lakhpat.

After gaining political power, the ‘ Sharif Group ‘ (Mian Sharif and his three sons) started to build the Jatti Umra Estate and the Sharif Medical City and Educational Complex near Raiwind in the outskirts of Lahore. The entire area was developed at state expense.The land area is 1500 Kanals of flat fertile land. From 3 Marlas (0.15 Kanal) to 30,000 Marlas, it’s a phenomenal rise unheard of in this part of the world. The land around the mausoleum of Baba Farid in Pakpattan was illegally allotted to gain favors. The Elahi Buksh Clinic on Lawrence Road was forcefully taken over from the family of Dr Buksh who lay buried there. The plots reserved for the widows and destitutes were doled out to party workers.

One of them built a house across the street in Johar Town where I lived, and he was not even a widower. He earned the title of ‘Disco’ as he had installed coloured flashing lights in his verandah. As a token of thanks to his leader, he installed a huge billlboard on the Main Canal Road depiciting Nawaz Sharif who was shown accepting a bouquet of flowers from his loyal worker. After the takeover in October 1999, the board suddenly disappeared overnight. It was hidden on the roof of his house. The neighbours in order to tease him warned him that the Air Surveillance unit had marked his house. In utter panic , he not only removed the evidence but also sold his house to save the bounty graciously granted him by his leader out of the quota reserved for the widows.

Bhutto moved from his Socialist Model to a Mixed Economic Model in which both the public and private sector could coexist, but the welfare of the people was kept paramount. China follows a similar model today after reforms. Following the international trends in the 1980s and 1990s, Zia opted for the ‘Free Market’ and ‘Trickledown Mode’. Mian Nawaz, ably assisted by Abba Ji, launched his own ‘Economic Plan’ first as Finance Minister of Punjab and then the Prime Minister of Pakistan. The PML(N) today is a financial cult that has enjoyed a long period of ‘ Trickle Up ‘. Public sector entities were delibratey driven into the ground to lower their value.

Privatization is not abdication, the state may be inefficient but it must guard public interests through regulatory mechanisms. While the world has suffered at the hands of the ‘ Trickledown ‘ mode, Pakstan has been plundered through the ‘Trickle Up ‘ bluff in the garb of economic development. The ‘ Zia-Sharif Economic ‘ model has to be dismantled as the ground realities are very grim. For the last 40 years, the PML(N) has been plundering the wealth of the nation like an invading army which it is not, though it was launched by the military in the 1980s, resulting in a disastrous economic meltdown.

Dr Farid A Malik
Dr Farid A Malikhttps://www.pakistantoday.com.pk
The writer is ex-Chairman, Pakistan Science Foundation. He can be contacted at: [email protected].

5 COMMENTS

  1. Who will hold the Pakistan Army for foisting Nawaz Sharif, a moron, over Pakistan for over thirty odd years? Scoundrels in the GHQ helped this predator to rule over Pakistan who has bankrupted Pakistan. Nawaz Sharif is an economic terrorist, and has to be brought to Justice.

  2. A good overview of tricle down phenomenon.The tricle down Economics is a gift from Chicago School of Economics.Its prominent proponent was a Noble laureate Dr Milton Friedman who was widely popular among looters and suckers Military dictators and US Republican Party.Capitalism and undemocratic socialism are disastrous for common man.Chines model is workable for a few generations but would have to return to democratic socialism.

  3. The article comprises allegations only.Had there been some irregularity why it is not being tried under court of law.If there is some policy difference please submit the alternative courses of action.why the growth rate went down to minus then zero and now up to 2% which is also debatable. If the economic policies of previous Govt were defective then why the present regime has not been able to emulate with them even when they have been changing their Finance Ministers every now and then.The fact of the matter is that the present Govt.is at a loss to understand the intricacies of the economy as accepted by the present incumbent.

  4. The Nawaz Sharif Mafia has captured administrative, bureaucratic, judicial, and law enforcement departments of Pakistan. The only institution left are the Armed forces of Pakistan. Therefore, it is the armed forces responsibility to bring this economic terrorists, Nawaz Sharif and his munshi, Ishaq Dar, to justice. It is the armed forces responsibility because it was this institution in the first place who nurtured and inculcated this predators in the first place.

Comments are closed.

Must Read

The deadline approaches

In trying to fix the power sector, the IMF has created a mess in the gas sectors, While signing the $8 billion Extended Fund...

Epaper_24-11-24 LHR

Epaper_24-11-24 KHI

Epaper_24-11-24 ISB