- Defense counsel asks judiciary to take note of ‘courts being used to settle scores’
ISLAMABAD: An Anti-Terrorism court (ATC) Islamabad o Tuesday remanded human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari in the police’s custody for three days.
On Monday, the human rights lawyer had been granted bail by the ATC in another case registered against her for participating in a protest in the federal capital organised by the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement. She, however, was arrested release from Adiala Jail by Islamabad police another case registered at the Bara Kahu police station under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA).
On Tuesday, ATC Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain presided over the proceedings and the prosecution argued for Imaan’s physical remand saying that they had reasons to believe she had been collecting money from people and using it for anti-state activities.
“We need to recover the amount in her possession,” said prosecutor Raja Naveed, stressing that it was crucial to investigation to get to others involved in the activity.
On the other hand, Advocate Zainab Janjua, the counsel for Imaan Mazari, argued that there was no need for her physical remand to be granted as she was already cooperating with the authorities.
“She is not an office holder for the PTM,” argued Janjua, adding that she was “willing to provide the bank statements”.
“Her laptop and phone are already in the police’s possession,” said the lawyer, questioning why the police needed to keep the accused in their custody.
“Imaan Mazari never met the person who filed the FIR, nor has she collected any money,” stated her counsel, bringing to the court’s attention the fact that the case was registered on August 26, when the accused was already in police custody.
“When Imaan was being released from Adiala Jail, Bara Kahu police was already present there,” she continued as she stressed that “one cannot register multiple FIRs over the same incident”. This way, she said, “if the court discharges [the accused] in one case, they are arrested in another”.
She also emphasised that the PTM’s organisers had obtained permission (NOC) from the authorities to hold the rally, requesting the court to dismiss the matter.
“Granting NOC does not mean permission for anti-state sloganeering,” argued the prosecutor. “If the court grants remand, evidence will be collected,’ he added.
This request, Janjua argued, was “unnecessary” as she assured the court of their full cooperation. “Courts are being used to settle scores,” she said, “the judiciary must take note of that”.
The ATC then went on to reserve its verdict after the completion of arguments. Later, the activist was sent on physical remand for three days.
